switched to harfbuzz subsetting and now subset alegreya*

This commit is contained in:
Alexander 2025-06-16 11:56:44 -04:00
parent 9092be7e61
commit 3620d94e7a
6 changed files with 69 additions and 30 deletions

View file

@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ let various_floats = [1.0; 4.0; 9.0]
let together : float ListMonad.t = ListMonad.bind sqrt various_floats
```
Here's an example of the monad in action. `together` is `[1.0; -1.0] @ [2.0; -2.0] @ [3.0; -3.0]`, which of course is `[1.0; -1.0; 2.0' -2.0; 3.0; -3.0]`. In this case, we used the taking-all-branches nature of the list monad to compute all the square roots of the numbers in the provided list. If taking the square-root is considered to be an ambiguous operation[^i-know], then *yada yada*. This monad is often used to run operations that have some ambiguous result, to capture the idea that multiple possible return values are valid, e.g. "the square root of four" can be considered ambiguous, since both 2^2^ and (-2)^2^ are 4. Another example of this can be found in parsing with ambiguous grammars. Parser combinator libraries often make it easy to define ambiguous-on-the-face parsers and resolve the ambiguity through some convention, but perhaps
Here's an example of the monad in action. `together` is `[1.0; -1.0] @ [2.0; -2.0] @ [3.0; -3.0]`, which of course is `[1.0; -1.0; 2.0; -2.0; 3.0; -3.0]`. In this case, we used the taking-all-branches nature of the list monad to compute all the square roots of the numbers in the provided list. If taking the square-root is considered to be an ambiguous operation[^i-know], then *yada yada*. This monad is often used to run operations that have some ambiguous result, to capture the idea that multiple possible return values are valid, e.g. "the square root of four" can be considered ambiguous, since both 2^2^ and (-2)^2^ are 4. Another example of this can be found in parsing with ambiguous grammars. Parser combinator libraries often make it easy to define ambiguous-on-the-face parsers and resolve the ambiguity through some convention, but perhaps
looks like multiple return with only one in the chain, but the sequencing is what gives us nondeterminism; multiple return doesn't chain the same. To do this without a monad we'd need to do